THRESHING TESTS
Near the beginning of the program of thresher development, the following tests were performed:
ANALYSIS OF THRESHING TESTS
From the data presented above, the following table can be derived:
|
Test Number |
Output (kg/hour) |
Power loss (watts) |
Endurance time (minutes) |
Male Eur Labor <25yrs (1) |
Strong Cyclist (2) |
Net Spec. Energy Req (kWh/Tonne) (1) |
Net Spec. Energy Req (kWh/Tonne) (2) |
|
1 (machine) |
34.5 |
54 |
30 |
170 |
177 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
|
2 (hand) |
31.2 |
n.a. |
10 |
220 |
273 |
5.8 |
7.2 |
|
3 (hand) |
37.9 |
n.a. |
10 |
220 |
273 |
4.6 |
5.8 |
TABLE I - Analysis of Sorghum Threshing Tests
Thus if one neglects the power input of the people feeding heads to the thresher (!), and if one assumes the use of an efficient power transmission (with effectively zero power loss), then it appears that for sorghum the use of a pedal thresher multiplies labor productivity by 1.9 to 2.2 over hand threshing. That compares with Islam's factor of 2.3 for the threshing of rice.
For Test # 4 (cowpeas) , power consumption was too low to be estimated (and anyway no comparable machine threshing was performed).
For Test #5, thresher output was 187.6 kg / hour for petrol input of 0.24 litre/hour. Assume calorific value of 10.5 kWh / litre, and engine thermodynamic efficiency of 15% to 25%. Thus specific energy requirement appears to be 2.01 - 3.36 kWh/tonne . That ties in with the calculated value of 3.1 - 3.3 kWh/tonne for pedal threshing as per Test #1 (Table I above).
Thus a pedal thresher appears to multiply labor productivity by a gross factor of 2.05 when compared with hand threshing, and a net factor of 1.37 if one considers a case with 4 pedallers plus 2 persons hand-feeding.